3 thoughts on “Missing Maura Murray Reveals More Details from Bill Rausch’s Civil Case”
I will try to condense this. Yesterday I commented on the 107 post about Bill's trial and I was slandered, you were slandered by Scott I guess and others. One came to my defense and oddly most of the 83 comments disappeared. I think Erinn is involved romantically with Bill– of course they can't get past you accused Fred of molestation which I don't think was direct and the family hates you. Scott even said he stole in college- who didn't? ???? Anyway, they have no facts just slander and it's scary. Bill's mother seemed to control Maura with that phone and I always suspected him before any of this– but the alibi. Lastly– do you have any doubts about the tandem driver? I just don't know who you think it was.
Thank you. Can you send screenshots of any of that to: jameswrenner[at]gmail.com
So according to Erinn, we have to consider "context" in the horrifying Bill using Maura's name incidents, but we can't consider context in how Bill's Maura pinned tweet suddenly disappeared?
Where did the court say, as one BR/EDL ally claimed, that you were not supposed to discuss the case publicly altogether, rather than simply not post the transcript?
I also don't hear anywhere in the podcast that it accuses Bill of "being convicted of attempted rape" as Scott claims. Everyone has correctly claimed that he will still go through the trial that will go into this year, as he is legally entitled to. Am I missing something, or is Scott trying to pull another smear?
I will try to condense this. Yesterday I commented on the 107 post about Bill's trial and I was slandered, you were slandered by Scott I guess and others. One came to my defense and oddly most of the 83 comments disappeared. I think Erinn is involved romantically with Bill– of course they can't get past you accused Fred of molestation which I don't think was direct and the family hates you. Scott even said he stole in college- who didn't? ???? Anyway, they have no facts just slander and it's scary. Bill's mother seemed to control Maura with that phone and I always suspected him before any of this– but the alibi. Lastly– do you have any doubts about the tandem driver? I just don't know who you think it was.
Thank you. Can you send screenshots of any of that to: jameswrenner[at]gmail.com
So according to Erinn, we have to consider "context" in the horrifying Bill using Maura's name incidents, but we can't consider context in how Bill's Maura pinned tweet suddenly disappeared?
Where did the court say, as one BR/EDL ally claimed, that you were not supposed to discuss the case publicly altogether, rather than simply not post the transcript?
I also don't hear anywhere in the podcast that it accuses Bill of "being convicted of attempted rape" as Scott claims. Everyone has correctly claimed that he will still go through the trial that will go into this year, as he is legally entitled to. Am I missing something, or is Scott trying to pull another smear?